“My code is shit”: Negative automatic thoughts and outcomes of a behavioral experiment for code review anxiety
This co-authored preprint reports on a mixed-methods intervention study on mitigating code review anxiety. The study developed and assessed a guided behavioral experiment toolkit. The findings indicated that the toolkit reduced code review anxiety and decreased the believability of negative automatic thoughts (NATs).
I include this work here because it demonstrates my experience in conducting empirical research in workplace learning contexts, and because it connects directly to my applied learning-design practice. The behavioral experiment examined here shares its cognitive-behavioral foundation with the Code Review Anxiety Workbook featured on my Learning Design page. Together the two artifacts show a praxis loop — research informing design, and design extending research into practice.
Lee, C. S., Hicks, C. M., & Foster-Marks, K. L. (2024). “My code is shit”: Negative automatic thoughts and outcomes of a behavioral experiment for code review anxiety. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/hz3et